4.5 Article

Nano-structural tailoring of manganese dioxide by using pulse current electrodeposition

期刊

SOLID STATE IONICS
卷 179, 期 39, 页码 2278-2283

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssi.2008.09.008

关键词

Manganese dioxide; Pulse Current electrodeposition; Nano-structures; Morphology; RAM Batteries

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A pulse current technique has been applied for the preparation of Manganese Dioxides (PCMD) in an additive-free MnSO(4)-H(2)SO(4) solution. The influence of pulse Current parameters on surface characteristics has been studied by using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Pore size distribution (PSD) of samples is determined from the desorption isotherm according to the Barrett-Joyner-Halenda (BJH) model. The subsequent effects on charge\discharge cycle performance of deposited materials have been studied in laboratory designed RAM batteries. SEM images confirmed a decrease in PCMDs surface roughness showing more coherent and cracks-free deposits compares to a sample, which is deposited by direct current (DCMD). Results show that under optimized pulse condition, PSD data in PCMD is narrower and less than 3 rim. whereas DCMD exhibits a boarder pore size distribution and larger pore volume. Grain size, pore size distribution and pore volume were established to be important factors determining electrochemical behavior of deposited materials. Results of RAM batteries revealed that the cycle life of batteries made of PCMDs were Father higher than that made by conventional DCMD. Functional improvements are mainly attributed to enhanced current distribution as well as fewer amounts of incorporated water molecules into the PCMD crystal lattice. These could be considered as a result of lower accumulation of passive intermediates and a lower anodic overvoltage during electrodeposition of PCMD. Depending on the applied pulse parameters, nano-tailoring of PCMDs in different morphological varieties is possible. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据