4.4 Article

One-step solvothermal synthesis of ZnO-carbon composite spheres containing different amounts of carbon and their use as visible light photocatalysts

期刊

SOLID STATE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 155, 期 -, 页码 53-56

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssc.2012.11.003

关键词

C-ZnO Composites; solvothermal; Electron microscopy; Catalytic properties

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2010CB934500, 2012CB825800, 2013CB932702]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [51132006, 21073127, 21071104]
  3. Foundation for the Author of National Excellent Doctoral Dissertation of China (FANEDD) [200929]
  4. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)
  5. Suzhou Planning Project of Science and Technology [ZXG2012028]
  6. Natural Science Foundation of the Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China [11KJB150015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To reduce its band gap of ZnO, a simple synthesis of ZnO-carbon composite spheres was developed using one-step solvothermal treatment of ethanol, Zn(Ac)(2)center dot 2H(2)O, and iodine. During the process, alcoholysis of zinc ions and carbonization of ethanol occurred simultaneously with catalysis by iodine. Ethanol acts as both solvent and carbon precursor. The mass of iodine used in the reaction affected the shape and carbon amount-of-substance fraction of the composite. The photocatalytic activities of composites with different carbon amount-of-substance fractions were evaluated by the degree of degradation of aqueous solutions of rhodamine B at room temperature with visible light irradiation. The best photocatalytic activity was observed for a sample with a carbon amount-of-substance fraction of 30%. The formation mechanism involves iodine promotion of the oxidation of ethanol, which results in formation of carbon that self-assembles with the ZnO into the ZnO-C composite spheres. Crown Copyright (C) 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据