4.7 Article

Composition dependent growth dynamics in molecular beam epitaxy of GaInNAs solar cells

期刊

SOLAR ENERGY MATERIALS AND SOLAR CELLS
卷 124, 期 -, 页码 150-158

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.solmat.2014.01.044

关键词

Plasma-assisted molecular beam epitaxy; Multi-junction solar cells; Dilute nitrides; GaInNAs; Concentrated photovoltaics

资金

  1. Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and Innovation-TEKES [40120/09 Solar III-V]
  2. County Administrative Board of Oulu for ENNA Project [S11249]
  3. National Graduate School in Material Physics
  4. Graduate School in Electronics, Telecommunication and Automation
  5. Ulla Tuominen Foundation
  6. Finnish Foundation for Technology Promotion
  7. Emil Aaltonen Foundation
  8. Wartsila Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have investigated the role of the nitrogen content, the growth parameters, and the annealing processes involved in molecular beam epitaxy of GaInNAs solar cells lattice-matched to GaAs. The nitrogen composition was varied between 1% and 5%. The influence of the growth temperature was assessed by performing photoluminescence, atomic force microscopy, X-ray diffraction, reflection high-energy electron diffraction, quantum efficiency and light-biased current-voltage measurements. The growth temperature ensuring the best cell parameters was found to be 440 degrees C. At this temperature we were able to incorporate up to 4% of nitrogen and achieve a good material quality. Further increase of the N composition to 5% led to phase separation. For the lattice matched samples grown within the optimal temperature range, we have identified a clear (1 x 3) surface reconstruction. Using the optimized growth we have demonstrated a GaInNAs p-i-n solar cell structure containing 4% nitrogen, that exhibited a short-circuit current density as high as 33.8 mA/cm(2) in respect to effective area illuminated. These measurements have been performed under real sun AM1.5 (similar to 1000 W/m(2)) illumination. (c) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据