4.6 Article

Sensitivity to change and prediction of global change for the Alzheimer's Questionnaire

期刊

ALZHEIMERS RESEARCH & THERAPY
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13195-014-0092-z

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (National Brain and Tissue Resource for Parkinson's Disease and Related Disorders) [U24 NS072026]
  2. National Institute on Aging (Arizona Alzheimer's Disease Core Center) [P30 AG19610]
  3. Arizona Department of Health Services (Arizona Alzheimer's Research Center) [211002]
  4. Arizona Biomedical Research Commission [4001, 0011, 05- 901, 1001]
  5. Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research
  6. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE [U24NS072026] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  7. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [P30AG019610] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Longitudinal assessment of cognitive decline in amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) often involves the use of both informant-based and objective cognitive assessments. As efforts have focused on identifying individuals in pre-clinical stages, instruments that are sensitive to subtle cognitive changes are needed. The Alzheimer's Questionnaire (AQ) has demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity in identifying aMCI and AD; however its ability to measure longitudinal change has not been assessed. The aims of this study are to assess the sensitivity to change of the AQ and to determine whether the AQ predicts change in global cognition and function in cognitively normal (CN), aMCI, and AD subjects. Methods: Data from 202 individuals participating in a brain and body donation program were utilized for this study (101 CN, 62 aMCI, 39 AD). AD and aMCI individuals were matched on age, education, and gender to CN individuals. Sensitivity to change of the AQ was assessed in addition to the AQ's ability to predict change in global cognition and function. The Mini Mental State Exam (MMSE) and Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ) were used as gold standard comparisons of cognition and function. Sample size calculations for a 25% treatment effect were also carried out for all three groups. Results: The AQ demonstrated small sensitivity to change in the aMCI and CN groups (d = 0.33, d = 0.23, respectively) and moderate sensitivity to change in the AD group (d = 0.43). The AQ was associated with increases in the Clinical Dementia Rating Global Score (OR = 1.20 (1.09, 1.32), P < 0.001). Sample size calculations found that the AQ would require substantially fewer subjects than the MMSE given a 25% treatment effect. Conclusions: Although the AQ demonstrated small sensitivity to change in aMCI and CN individuals in terms of effect size, the AQ may be superior to objective cognitive tests in terms of required sample size for a clinical trial. As clinicians and researchers continue to identify and treat individuals in earlier stages of AD, there is a need for instruments that are sensitive to cognitive changes in these earlier stages.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据