4.7 Review

Business, market and intellectual property analysis of polymer solar cells

期刊

SOLAR ENERGY MATERIALS AND SOLAR CELLS
卷 94, 期 10, 页码 1553-1571

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.solmat.2010.04.074

关键词

Business analysis; Market analysis; IPR analysis; Intellectual property analysis; Polymer solar cells; Organic solar cells; OPV; Roll-to-roll processing; Polymer solar cell modules; Patents

资金

  1. Danish Strategic Research Council [DSF 2104-07-0022]
  2. EUDP [64009-0050]
  3. PV-ERA-NET

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The business potential of polymer solar cells is reviewed and the market opportunities analyzed on the basis of the currently reported and projected performance and manufacturing cost of polymer solar cells. Possible new market areas are identified and described. An overview of the present patent and intellectual property situation is also given and a patent map of polymer solar cells is drawn in a European context. It is found that the business potential of polymer solar cells is large when taking the projections for future performance into account while the currently available performance and manufacturing cost leaves little room for competition on the thin film photovoltaic market. However, polymer solar cells do enable the competitive manufacture of low cost niche products and is viewed as financially viable in its currently available form in a large volume approximation. Finally, it is found that the polymer solar cell technology is very poorly protected in Europe with the central patents being valid in only France, Germany, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. Several countries with a large potential for PV such as Portugal and Greece are completely open and have apparently no relevant patents. This is viewed as a great advantage for the possible commercialization of polymer solar cells in a European setting as the competition for the market will be based on the manufacturing performance rather than domination by a few patent stakeholders. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据