4.7 Article

Simultaneous determination of carrier lifetime and electron density-of-states in P3HT:PCBM organic solar cells under illumination by impedance spectroscopy

期刊

SOLAR ENERGY MATERIALS AND SOLAR CELLS
卷 94, 期 2, 页码 366-375

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.solmat.2009.10.015

关键词

Impedance spectroscopy; Lifetime; Organic solar cell; Bulk heterojunction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report new insights into recombination kinetics in poly(3-hexylthiophene):methanofullerene (P3HT:PCBM) bulk heterojunction (BHJ) solar cells, based on simultaneous determination of the density of states (DOS), internal recombination resistance, and carrier lifetime, at different steady states, by impedance spectroscopy. A set of measurements at open circuit under illumination was performed aiming to better understand the limitations to the photovoltage, which in this class of solar cells remains far below the theoretical limit which is the difference between the LUMO level of PCBM and the HOMO of P3HT (similar to 1.1 eV). Recombination kinetics follows a bimolecular law, being the recombination time (lifetime) inversely proportional to the density of photogenerated charges and the recombination coefficient gamma=6 x 10(-13) cm3 s(-1). We find that the open-circuit photovoltage is governed by the carrier ability of occupying the DOS, which results in Gaussian shape and spreads in energy sigma approximate to 125-140 meV. The energy position of the Gaussian DOS center (E-L=0.75-0.80 eV), which corresponds to half occupation of the electron DOS, approximates LUMO(PCBM)-HOMO(P3HT) difference. But the recombination rate is strongly enhanced at high illumination levels, what produces the photogenerated charge to remain in the tail of the DOS. Consequently, the electron and hole Fermi levels are unable to reach the center of the DOS, then substantially limiting the photovoltage. Detailed theoretical analysis of the lifetime dependence on photovoltage is provided. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据