4.7 Article

Electrochromic and electrochemical properties of 3-pyridinyl and 1,10-phenanthroline bearing poly(2,5-di(2-thienyl)-1H-pyrrole) derivatives

期刊

SOLAR ENERGY MATERIALS AND SOLAR CELLS
卷 94, 期 7, 页码 1286-1292

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.solmat.2010.03.027

关键词

Electrochemistry; Electrochemical polymerization; Conducting polymer; Electrochromism; Electrochromic device

资金

  1. Korean Goverment [2009-0079376]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2009-0079376] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examined a highly efficient synthetic route and characterization of two derivatives of 2,5-di(2-thienyl)-1H-pyrrole that incorporated 3-pyridinyl and 1,10-phenanthroline moieties in the central pyrrole ring. The electrically conductive polyPTPy and polyPhenTPy films were synthesized through electropolymerization on a glassy carbon electrode in a 0.1 M TBAP/dichloromethane solution. The polymer films were characterized using cyclic voltammetry (CV), in situ conductivity measurements, and in situ spectroelectrochemistry. The redox peaks of the polyPTPy and polyPhenTPy films were observed at 0.96/0.66 and 0.89/0.73 V. respectively. The maximum conductivities of polyFTPy and polyPhenTPy were 6.5 x 10(-2) and 9.2 x 10(-2) S/cm at 1.4 V. The spectroelectrochemical analysis showed that the polyPTPy film was brownish-yellow color (lambda(max)=430 nm) in the neutral state and dark blue (1.4 V) in the fully oxidized state. Similarly, polyPhenTPy was greenish-yellow color (lambda(max)=451 nm) in the neutral state and light blue (1.4 V) in the fully oxidized state. The polymer films exhibited a fast optical switching time within 1.0 s. The electrochemical and spectroelectrochemical characterizations of these films revealed that the materials were highly electroactive and robust in terms of electrochromics. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据