4.4 Article

Soil Enzyme Activities in Permafrost Regions of the Western Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau

期刊

SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL
卷 76, 期 4, 页码 1280-1289

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2011.0400

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2010CB951402]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41071143, 41101524, 40901042]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Cryospheric Sciences [SKLCS 2010-06]
  4. K.C. Wong Education Foundation
  5. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Enzyme activities play key roles in the biochemical functioning of soils, in processes such as soil organic matter formation and degradation, and nutrient cycling. They are indicators of soil quality and key to soil ecosystem functioning. In this study, the effect of vegetation communities and soil properties on the activities of invertase, alkaline phosphatase, amylase, urease, cellulose, and catalase were investigated in permafrost regions of the middle and western Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. This area is characterized by cold, arid steppe, with an active layer thicker than 2 m. The results demonstrated that soil enzyme activities were higher in Stipa roborowskyi Roshev. vegetation communities than those of Carex moorcroftii Falconer ex Boott communities. Soil enzyme activities were lowest in the alpine cold desert area. The activities per unit soil were primarily positively related to soil organic C (SOC) and moisture contents, and when activities were expressed as per unit C, they were primarily positively related to gravel content and negatively to moisture content. Results demonstrated that the vegetation communities, SOC, and moisture contents were important factors influencing soil enzyme activities, while permafrost, vegetation cover, and topographic factors played less important roles in the cold, arid area of the northwestern part of Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Potential SOC changes in this area were also investigated with regard to future climate change.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据