4.4 Article

Sorption, Volatilization, and Efficacy of the Fumigant 1,3-Dichloropropene in a Biochar-Amended Soil

期刊

SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL
卷 75, 期 4, 页码 1365-1373

出版社

SOIL SCI SOC AMER
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2010.0435

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development of Israel [301-0693-10]
  2. Agricultural Research Organization, the Volcani Center, Israel [615/10]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sorption of the soil fumigant, 1,3-dichloropropene (DCP), on cornstraw biochar (fast pyrolysis at 500 degrees C; specific surface area [SSA] of 3.0 m(2) g(-1)) was strongly nonlinear and significantly greater on a soil-1% biochar mixture (26 Mg biochar ha(-1)) than on soil alone. This resulted in substantial reductions in DCP concentrations in the vapor phase. However, concentration of the fumigant in the aqueous phase of the soil, where it is active against soil nematodes, was also significantly reduced due to strong sorption to the biochar. In the studied system, adequate nematode control was achieved at 13 and 26 Mg biochar ha(-1) and DCP of 94 and 187 L ha(-1), respectively, where the fumigant manufacturers suggested dose range of DCP is 84 to 514 L ha(-1). Biochars produced at relatively high temperatures (> 600 degrees C) with a high SSA have been shown to absorb organic chemicals more strongly by one or more orders of magnitude than those, like the biochar used herein, produced at lower temperatures with a low SSA. Calculations show that adequate nematode control would not have been obtained had the biochar absorbed only five times more DCP per given solution concentration. Thus it is evident that while nematode control was adequate in the specific studied system, soil amendment with biochar could adversely impact pest control, depending on the sorption strength of the particular biochar. This issue should be considered when determining desirable biochar physical and chemical characteristics for use in agronomic systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据