4.2 Article

Effects of Permanent Raised Beds on Soil Chemical Properties in a Wheat-Maize Cropping System

期刊

SOIL SCIENCE
卷 178, 期 1, 页码 46-53

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/SS.0b013e318285f59e

关键词

Permanent raised beds; soil chemical properties; soil organic carbon; total nitrogen; double cropping system

资金

  1. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [6112015]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51205398, 51175499]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Traditional tillage (TT) in the North China Plain has maintained grain productivity in the past 50 years. Nonetheless, it has also been a major contributor to global greenhouse gas emissions, biodiversity and soil fertility loss, soil degradation, and even desertification. Permanent raised beds (PRB) have been proposed as a viable solution to achieve sustainable farming in this plain. The effects on soil chemical properties of the PRB treatment and two other treatments, namely, no-tillage and TT treatments, were measured between 2005 and 2011 in the annual double cropping regions of the North China Plain. The soil properties significantly (P < 0.05) affected by the different treatments. Stratification ratios of soil organic carbon, total nitrogen, available N, available phosphorus, and available potassium under PRB (>1.35) were significantly (P < 0.05) higher than those under no-tillage and TT. In the cropping zone of PRB, the bulk density was significantly reduced by 14.4%, whereas soil organic carbon, total nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium and available nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium in the 0- to 10-cm soil layer were significantly increased by 24.8%, 78.8%, 121.9%, 81.8%, 46.2%, 7.0%, 2.9%, respectively, in comparison with those of TT treatments. Winter wheat and summer maize yields in PRB also underwent a slight increase. Permanent raised beds seem to be an improvement on current farming systems in the North China Plain and valuable for the sustainability of farming in this region.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据