4.2 Article

Physical Effects of Organic Matter Amendment of a Southeastern US Coastal Loamy Sand

期刊

SOIL SCIENCE
卷 176, 期 12, 页码 661-667

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/SS.0b013e3182357ca9

关键词

Biochar; soil amendment; organic carbon; Coastal Plain; penetration resistance

资金

  1. US Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service (ARS)
  2. ARS-GRACEnet

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We tested 12 organic sources as amendments for E horizon and a mixture of E and Bt horizons of a southeastern coastal loamy sand. Amendments were intended to increase carbon and improve soil physical properties. Amendments included biochar, cellulose, corn (Zea mays L.) stalk, corn starch, cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) hull, cotton meal, manure residual, peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) hull, poultry litter, soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) plant, wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) straw, and wood shavings. Amendments were added at a rate of similar to 1% (wt wt(-1)) or similar to 22 Mg ha(-1) organic carbon content to 450 g soil and incubated in a laboratory for 60 days. Cellulose, corn stalk, and corn starch amendments had the most dry-sieved aggregation at 35% versus the control, peanut hull, poultry litter, wood shavings, and biochar, which had the least at 21%. Biochar, wood shavings, and corn starch-amended treatments had the highest penetration resistances at 0.25 to 0.38 MPa above the mean; cellulose and cotton meal had the lowest at 0.24 to 0.32 MPa below the mean. Poultry litter and manure residual-amended treatments needed the least amount of water added to maintain 0.1 (wt wt(-1)); cellulose, biochar, and soybean plant needed the most. All needed less than the control. Mixing Bt horizon into the E improved most physical properties. All amendments improved some physical properties-more carbon, more aggregation, or reduced soil penetration resistance. Biochar retained 26% of its carbon, more than other amendments that retained 13% to 23%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据