4.7 Article

Effect of interface friction on tunnel liner internal forces due to seismic S- and P-wave propagation

期刊

SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING
卷 46, 期 -, 页码 41-51

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2012.12.010

关键词

Earthquake; Tunnel; Centrifuge test; Interface friction; Unreinforced final lining

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effects on the hoop force and bending moment developed in the lining of a circular tunnel of the contact properties of the soil-lining interface are investigated numerically for both cases of S- and P-seismic wave propagation. Development of a robust model for the dynamic simulation of this problem includes: (i) the implementation of a hysteretic model of the non-linear soil response under cyclic loads in the finite element code ABAQUS; and (ii) validation of the analyses results against centrifuge tests from the literature and closed-from elasticity solutions. Accordingly, a parametric study is conducted to quantify the effect of adopting different values of the friction coefficient of the tunnel liner interface, while assuming that the relaxation load is transferred only to the temporary support shell of the tunnel; a hypothesis applicable mainly to tunnels constructed with the NATM method where an unreinforced concrete final lining is usually installed. Practical findings of this study suggest that the full-slip assumption should be used in conjunction with closed-form expressions for preliminary estimates of the tunnel response. On the contrary, for tunnels where the lining is designed to bear the soil loads, numerical tools should be used for the rational assessment of their seismic response. In the latter case, more experimental studies are needed to evaluate the friction properties at the interface, since common expressions correlating the friction coefficient with the friction angle of the surrounding soil do not appear compatible with the centrifuge test results examined herein. Crown Copyright (C) 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据