4.7 Article

Numerical analysis of liquefaction of porous seabed around pipeline fixed in space under seismic loading

期刊

SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING
卷 29, 期 5, 页码 855-864

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2008.09.002

关键词

Submarine pipeline; Seismic loading; Excess pore pressure; Liquefaction

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50439010, 50639010, 50579006, 50179006]
  2. Ministry of Education of China [305003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Liquefaction of seabed under seismic loading is one of the main points that govern the overall stability of submarine pipeline. However, most previous investigations concerned only with free seabed and searched for seismic accumulative excess pore pressure by solving Terzaghi's consolidation equation containing pore pressure Source term. it is not able to introduce two-dimensional structures such as submarine pipelines in one-dimensional problem, and it is also not able to obtain the distribution of seismic accumulative excess pore pressure in seabed around Submarine pipelines by such a way. In this study, a FEM numerical analysis method for determining the liquefaction of sandy seabed around a buried pipeline under seismic loading is presented. The empirical mode of dynamic increase of pore pressure under undrained shearing induced by seismic loading is incorporated with two-dimensional dynamic consolidation equation and a numerical procedure based oil FEM is developed to assess the accumulative excess pore pressure. By numerical computations, the accumulative process of pore pressure and liquefaction potential of seabed soil during seismic loading is evaluated. From a series of numerical computations based on the presented model with various parameters, the effects of soil characteristic parameters and pipeline geometry oil seismic accumulative excess pore pressure around submarine pipeline and along the depth of seabed are explored in detail. Crown Copyright (C) 2008 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据