4.7 Article

Earthquake damage detection in the Imperial County Services Building - III: Analysis of wave travel times via impulse response functions

期刊

SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING
卷 28, 期 5, 页码 387-404

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2007.07.001

关键词

damage detection; structural health monitoring; wave travel times; deconvolution; impulse response function; earthquake response; wave propagation in structures; imperial county services building

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The majority of structural health monitoring methods are based on detecting changes in the modal properties, which are global characteristics of the structure, and are not sensitive to local damage. Wave travel times between selected sections of a structure, on the other hand, are local characteristics, and are potentially more sensitive to local damage. In this paper, a structural health monitoring method based on changes in wave travel times is explored using strong motion data from the Imperial Valley Earthquake of 1979 recorded in the former Imperial County Services (ICS) Building, severely damaged by this earthquake. Wave travel times are measured from impulse response functions computed from the recorded horizontal seismic response in three time windows-before, during, and after the largest amplitude response, as determined front previous studies of this building, based on analysis of novelties in the recorded response. The results suggest initial spatial distribution of stiffness consistent with the design characteristics, and reduction of stiffness following the major damage consistent with the spatial distribution of the observed damage. The travel times were also used to estimate the fundamental fixed-base frequency of the structure f(1) (assuming the building deformed as a shear beam), and its changes during this earthquake. These estimates are consistent with previous estimates of the soil-structure system frequency, f(sys), during the earthquakes (f(1)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据