4.7 Article

Relative impacts of tillage, residue management and crop-rotation on soil bacterial communities in a semi-arid agroecosystem

期刊

SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 65, 期 -, 页码 86-95

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.05.009

关键词

Conservational agriculture; Pyrosequencing; UniFrac; Tillage; Crop rotation; Residue management

资金

  1. ABACUS, 'Consejo National de Ciencia y Tecnologia' (CONACyT)
  2. 'Centro de Investigacion y de Estudios Avanzados' (Cinvestav)
  3. 'Centro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Maiz y Trigo' (CIMMYT) via CRP MAIZE
  4. SAGARPA
  5. Instituto de Ciencia y Tecnologia del Distrito Federal (ICyTDF, Mexico)
  6. CONACyT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the effect of limited tillage versus traditional tillage, residue retention versus removal and crop rotation (maize wheat) versus monoculture (maize) on the bacterial community structure in soils was investigated by means of 454 pyrosequencing of the 16S rRNA gene. Using taxonomic and phylogenetic information it was found that zero tillage most affected the bacterial communities. The relative abundance of Actinobacteria, Betapreoteobacteria and Gammaproteobacteria was affected by tillage and correlated to the total organic carbon (TOC) and clay content in soil. Residue management had a significant effect on the bacterial community structure when phylogenetic membership and the total enumeration of bacteria were considered. Residue management affected the relative abundance of Bacteroidetes, Betaproteobacteria, Cyanobacteria and Gemmatimonadetes. When no tillage was applied, crop residue management affected the microbial communities more than when conventional tillage was applied. Wheat maize rotation or crop monoculture did not affect the bacterial community structure. No significant differences in richness, diversity and total abundance of bacteria was found between the treatments. This indicated that even though phylotypes changed, the number and diversity of the bacterial communities were similar. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据