4.7 Article

The under-recognized dominance of Verrucomicrobia in soil bacterial communities

期刊

SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 43, 期 7, 页码 1450-1455

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.03.012

关键词

Verrucomicrobia; Spartobacteria; Bacteria; Relative abundance; Ecological dominance; Primer bias; Barcoded pyrosequencing; 16S rRNA genes; Oligotroph; Subsurface horizon

资金

  1. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
  2. Crohn's and Colitis Foundation of America
  3. National Institutes of Health
  4. National Science Foundation
  5. U.S. Department of Agriculture
  6. Division Of Environmental Biology
  7. Direct For Biological Sciences [953331] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Verrucomicrobia are ubiquitous in soil, but members of this bacterial phylum are thought to be present at low frequency in soil, with few studies focusing specifically on verrucomicrobial abundance, diversity, and distribution. Here we used barcoded pyrosequencing to analyze verrucomicrobial communities in surface soils collected across a range of biomes in Antarctica, Europe, and the Americas (112 samples), as well as soils collected from pits dug in a montane coniferous forest (69 samples). Data collected from surface horizons indicate that Verrucomicrobia average 23% of bacterial sequences, making them far more abundant than had been estimated. We show that this underestimation is likely due to primer bias, as many of the commonly used PCR primers appear to exclude verrucomicrobial 165 rRNA genes during amplification. Verrucomicrobia were detected in 180 out of 181 soils examined, with members of the class Spartobacteria dominating verrucomicrobial communities in nearly all biomes and soil depths. The relative abundance of Verrucomicrobia was highest in grasslands and in subsurface soil horizons, where they were often the dominant bacterial phylum. Although their ecology remains poorly understood, Verrucomicrobia appear to be dominant in many soil bacterial communities across the globe, making additional research on their ecology clearly necessary. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据