4.7 Article

Negligible contribution from roots to soil-borne phospholipid fatty acid fungal biomarkers 18:2ω6,9 and 18:1ω9

期刊

SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 42, 期 9, 页码 1650-1652

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.05.019

关键词

PLFAs; Fungal biomarkers; 18:2 omega 6,9; 18:1 omega 9; Soil microbial community; Ectomycorrhizal fungi; Girdling; Beech roots

资金

  1. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P18495-B03, S1001-B07]
  2. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [I 370] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The phospholipid fatty acid biomarkers 18:1 omega 9, 18:2 omega 6,9 and 18:3 omega 3,6,9 are commonly used as fungal biomarkers in soils. They have, however, also been found to occur in plant tissues, such as roots. Thus, the use of these PLFAs as fungal biomarkers in sieved soil, which may still contain small remains of roots, has been questioned. We used data from a recent beech tree girdling experiment to calculate the contribution of roots to these biomarkers and were able to demonstrate that not more than 0.61% of 18:1 omega 9 and 18:2 omega 6,9 in sieved soil samples originated from roots (but 4% of 18:3 omega 3,6,9). Additionally, the abundance of the biomarker 18:2 omega 6,9 in the soil was found to be highly correlated to ectomycorrhizal root colonization, which further corroborates its fungal origin. PLFA biomarkers were substantially reduced in vital roots from girdled trees compared to roots of control trees (by up to 76%), indicating that the major part of PLFAs measured in roots may actually originate from ectomycorrhizal fungi growing inside the roots. We calculated, that even a near to 50% reduction in fine root biomass - as observed in the girdling treatment - accounted for only 0.8% of the measured decrease of 18:2 omega 6,9. Our results demonstrate that both 18:1 omega 9 and 18:2 omega 6,9 are suitable biomarkers for detecting fungal dynamics in soils and that especially 18:2 omega 6,9 is a reliable biomarker to study mycorrhizal dynamics in beech forests. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据