4.7 Article

Spatial heterogeneity provides organic matter refuges for soil microbial activity in the Patagonian steppe, Argentina

期刊

SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 41, 期 6, 页码 1348-1351

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.03.008

关键词

Microbial biomass; beta-Glucosidase activity; Mosses; Arid ecosystems; Extracellular enzymes; Biogeochemistry; Carbon cycling; Islands of fertility; Semi-arid steppe; Patagonia; Argentina

资金

  1. Canon National Parks Science Scholars Program
  2. Fundacion Antorchas (Argentina)
  3. Fundacion Antorchas (Argentina) [G812]
  4. ANPCyT [PICT 21247, PICT 31970]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In and and semi-arid ecosystems that are frequently classified as water limited, it is unclear how spatial and temporal variability of vegetation and climate could affect microbially-mediated soil processes. Our objective was to determine how aboveground spatial heterogeneity creates characteristic soil conditions that modulate microbial growth and activity in a semi-arid Patagonian steppe. In particular, we explored how micro-environmental and biogeochemical soil characteristics generated by the native vegetation could control soil beta-glucosidase activity. Both life-form (shrubs, grasses, mosses and bare soil) and season exerted strong controls on all measured abiotic (soil temperature and gravimetric soil water content, inorganic nitrogen, pH and total C and N) and biotic (microbial biomass C and beta-glucosidase activity) soil characteristics. Partial correlation between beta-glucosidase activity and extracellular organic C (EOC) was high across seasons (r = 0.5; P < 0.001) while soil water content did not correlate with soil enzymatic activity (r = 0.09: P > 0.05). We postulate that labile soil carbon rather than water availability functions as a principal limitation of microbial activity in this semi-arid ecosystem, and the distribution of this carbon is, in large part, determined by the patchy distribution of vegetation. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据