4.7 Article

Collembola switch diet in presence of plant roots thereby functioning as herbivores

期刊

SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 41, 期 6, 页码 1151-1154

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.02.022

关键词

Springtails; Decomposer; Food preferences; Rhizosphere; Stable isotopes; 13-C

资金

  1. German Science Foundation (DFG)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Collembola are abundant and ubiquitous soil decomposers, being particularly active in the rhizosphere of plants where they are assumed to be attracted by high microbial activity and biomass. While feeding on root associated microorganisms or organic matter they may also ingest plant roots, e.g. particularly root hairs and fine roots. Employing stable isotope analysis we investigated Collembola (Protaphorura fimata Gisin) feeding preferences and types of ingested resources. We offered Collembola two resources with distinct isotope signatures: a C4 plant (Zea mays L) planted in soil mixed with N-15 labelled litter of Lolium perenne L (C3 plant). We hypothesised that Collembola obtain their nutrients (C and N) from different resources, with their carbon being mainly derived from resources that are closely associated to the plant root, e.g. root exudates, causing enrichment in C-13 in Collembola tissue, while the incorporated nitrogen originating from litter resources. In contrast to our hypothesis, stable isotope analysis suggests that in absence of plant roots Collembola derived both the incorporated C and N predominantly from litter whereas in presence of plant roots they switched diet and obtained both C and N almost exclusively from plant roots. The results indicate that Collembola in the rhizosphere of plants, being assumed to be mainly decomposers, in fact predominately live on plant resources, presumably fine roots or root hairs, i.e. are herbivorous rather than detritivorous or fungivorous. These findings have major implications on the view how plants respond to decomposers in the rhizosphere. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据