4.7 Article

Simultaneous measurement of S, macronutrients, and heavy metals in the soil microbial biomass with CHCl3 fumigation and NH4NO3 extraction

期刊

SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 41, 期 2, 页码 309-314

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.11.001

关键词

Microbial biomass S; CHCl3-labile metals; Heavy metals; Fumigation-extraction

资金

  1. Regulation of soil organic matter and nutrient turnover in organic agriculture
  2. German Research Foundation (DFG)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study was carried out to investigate whether 1 M NH4NO3 extraction is a useful alternative to 10 mM CaCl2 extraction for estimating soil microbial biomass S and whether the data of CHCl3-labile NH4NO3-extractable macronutrients and heavy metals are useful and in agreement with the available data on element concentrations in soil microorganisms. Microbial biomass C was followed by microbial biomass S after CaCl2 extraction with an average C/S ratio of 82, and by microbial biomass S after NH4NO3 extraction with an average C/S ratio of 57. The mean contribution of CHCl3-labile metals in relation to the NH4NO3-extractable fraction from non-fumigated soils ranged from 0.1 to 112% in the order potassium < magnesium < cadmium < sodium < zinc + nickel < manganese < copper. The mean contribution of CHCl3-labile metals in relation to the microbial biomass C ranged from 0.03 to 22 parts per thousand in the order cadmium < nickel < zinc < manganese < magnesium < copper < sodium < potassium. These relative contributions varied within the different metals from a 4-fold (Na+) to a more than 200-fold range (Cu-2). Significant positive correlations with microbial biomass C were observed for CHCl3-labile zinc, sodium and especially potassium. The concentration of all elements except copper in relation to microbial biomass C were in the range known from the limited literature on fungi grown on heavy metal contaminated soils. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据