4.7 Article

Soil macro- and microstructure as affected by different tillage systems and their effects on maize root growth

期刊

SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH
卷 140, 期 -, 页码 55-65

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2014.02.003

关键词

No tillage; Conventional tillage; Pore size distribution; X-ray microtomography; Mercury intrusion porosimetry; Root growth

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tillage practices are critical factors for the sustainability of cropping systems by modifying the soil properties and affecting root growth. In this study we compared conventional (CT) and no tillage (NT) practices to evaluate their effects on soil structure and maize root morphology and dynamics during a two-year transition period. Pore size distribution and morphology-related parameters were analyzed with a combination of X-ray microtomography (microCT) (54-22501 mu m) and mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP) (0.0074-100 mu m) within the 0-40 cm soil profile. The network model PoreXpert was applied to MIP pore distribution curves to identify subtle structural changes as affected by tillage. Root samples were collected down to 1-m depth with the core method during 2005 and 2006,40 and 114 days after sowing, in order to quantify their mass, length and diameter. Results suggested that tillage practices affected the soil macroporosity (54-750 mu m) while the micropores, detected with MIP, did not show significant differences between treatments. Conventional tillage, disrupting the macropore structure and enhancing the pore class in the range 54-250 mu m, improved the soil loosening. Bulk density measurements, achieved in the last date (day 114, 2006), were negatively correlated with root growth indicators. Nevertheless, root growth was weakly affected by tillage since the soil structure did not reach a new architecture after the introduction of NT. In spite of the experiment being conducted in the short-term and the soil structure still being unpredictable, microCT analysis proved its ability to predict subtle structure changes as affected by conventional and no tillage practices. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据