4.7 Article

Soil management effects on runoff, erosion and soil properties in an olive grove of Southern Spain

期刊

SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH
卷 102, 期 1, 页码 5-13

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2008.05.005

关键词

Olive; Erosion; Runoff; Soil properties

资金

  1. INIA [CA098-15]
  2. Autonomous Andalusian Government [CAO 01-001-C4-0, AGR2005-00595, AGR2349]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rainfall, runoff and soil loss from 6 m x 12 m plots were recorded during 7 years (2000-2006) in an experiment in which three different soil management systems were compared in a young olive grove installed on a heavy clay soil, near Cordoba, Southern Spain. The no-tillage (NT) system, kept weed-free with herbicides, had both the largest soil loss (6.9 t ha(-1) year(-1)) and the highest average annual runoff coefficient (11.9%). By contrast, a cover crop (CC) of barley, reduced the soil losses to 0.8 t ha(-1) year(-1) and the average annual runoff coefficient to 1.2%. Conventional tillage (CT), had intermediate values of soil loss (2.9 t ha(-1) year(-1)) and an average runoff coefficient of 3.1%. The different treatments were established 4 years after planting the olive trees, and a significant decrease in soil and runoff losses was observed with time as the olive trees grew and their canopies developed. Measurements at the end of the experiment showed a significant improvement in the topsoil properties of the CC treatment as compared to CT and NT. The soil under NT presented a significant degradation with respect to traditional CT management. Organic matter values were 2.0, 1.4 and 1.0%, and stability in water of macroaggregates was 0.452, 0.418 and 0.258 kg kg(-1) for CC, CT and NT, respectively. These results indicate that the use of a cover crop can be a simple, feasible soil and water conservation practice in olive groves on rolling lands in the region. A key factor in its practical use is to establish it early enough to protect the soil in the critical initial years of the grove, when most of the soil is unprotected by the small olive canopy. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据