4.6 Article

Nanosecond lipid dynamics in membranes containing cholesterol

期刊

SOFT MATTER
卷 10, 期 15, 页码 2600-2611

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3sm51757h

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada
  2. National Research Council (NRC)
  3. Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI)
  4. Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation
  5. Scientific User Facilities Division of the Office of Basic Energy Sciences (BES)
  6. Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) program of Oak Ridge National Laboratory
  7. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-AC05-00OR2275]
  8. Province of Ontario

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lipid dynamics in the cholesterol-rich (40 mol%) liquid-ordered (l(o)) phase of dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine membranes were studied using neutron spin-echo and neutron backscattering. Recent theoretical and experimental evidence supports the notion of the liquid-ordered phase in phospholipid membranes as a locally structured liquid, with small ordered 'domains' of a highly dynamic nature in equilibrium with a disordered matrix [S. Meinhardt, R. L. C. Vink and F. Schmid, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2013, 110(12), 4476-4481, C. L. Armstrong et al., PLoS One, 2013, 8(6), e66162]. This local structure was found to have a pronounced impact on the membranes' dynamical properties. We found that the long-wavelength dynamics in the liquid-ordered phase, associated with the elastic properties of the membranes, were faster by two orders of magnitude as compared to the liquid disordered phase. At the same time, collective nanoscale diffusion was significantly slower. The presence of a soft-mode (a slowing down) in the long-wavelength dispersion relationship suggests an upper size limit for the ordered lipid domain of approximate to 220 angstrom. Moreover, from the relaxation rate of the collective lipid diffusion of lipid-lipid distances, the lifetime of these domains was estimated to be about 100 nanoseconds.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据