4.6 Review

Defect science and engineering of liquid crystals under geometrical frustration

期刊

SOFT MATTER
卷 9, 期 34, 页码 8107-8120

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3sm50468a

关键词

-

资金

  1. JSPS
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan
  3. Aihara Project
  4. FIRST program from JSPS
  5. CSTP
  6. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21224011, 25000002, 23244088, 24540433] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Spontaneous symmetry breaking while preserving flow ability is a remarkable feature of nematic liquid crystals. When a nematic liquid crystal coexists with a solid, the surface field of the solid tends to anchor the director direction on the surface: anchoring effects. If geometrical frustration between nematic ordering and anchoring is strong enough, stable topological defects are formed. Defects in an ordered state are usually regarded as undesirable features. However, recent studies reveal that defects stabilized by a topological constraint from the solid surfaces are actually quite useful and open up novel possibilities for defect engineering of liquid crystals: self-organization of soft matter by defects, memory effects of topological origin, and control of flow of nematic liquid crystals and colloid motion by defects. For example, defect reconfiguration accompanying the change in the topology costs a very high energy far beyond the thermal energy, which overwhelms a typical energy scale in soft matter. This provides extreme stability for structures assembled by defects and information memorized in defect topology. Furthermore, effects of topological defects can easily be removed perfectly by a nematic-to-isotropic transition, which provides switchable functions. Defects also affect the motion of colloids immersed in a liquid crystal and flow behaviour of a liquid crystal. Here we review recent developments in science and engineering of topological defects in nematic liquid crystals, mainly based on our numerical simulation studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据