4.6 Article

Polymersomes as radionuclide carriers loaded via active ion transport through the hydrophobic bilayer

期刊

SOFT MATTER
卷 9, 期 3, 页码 727-734

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c2sm26434j

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Economical Affairs of the Netherlands
  2. province of South Holland (3Binding)
  3. Chinese Scientific Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Vesicles composed of amphiphilic block copolymers (i.e. polymersomes) have already been shown to have great potential in drug delivery. Nuclear imaging techniques such as Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) are indispensable in the correct evaluation of biodistribution and pharmacokinetics of newly or not fully investigated polymersome formulations. However, to date, polymer vesicles, in contrast to their lipid counterparts, have not been loaded with radionuclides. In this paper, we have investigated the so-called active loading method to trap radionuclides into preformed polymersomes composed of poly(butadiene-b-ethylene oxide) having variable membrane and brush thickness. We have used tropolone as a lipophilic agent to transport the radioactive isotope of indium, In-111, through the hydrophobic membrane into the aqueous cavity containing the strong hydrophilic chelate diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA). The results show that a high loading efficiency of In-111(3+) (>85%) can be achieved at short incubation times in polymersomes with membrane thicknesses twice the size of typical lipid bilayers. However, increasing the molecular weight of the block copolymers results in a lower radiolabelling efficiency and a much slower loading rate. In addition, both the DTPA and tropolone concentrations have been found to influence the loading efficiency. Finally, we not only demonstrate that a significant amount of this radioisotope can be successfully encapsulated in the polymersomes, but also report that a negligible loss (<5% in 48 hours) is observed, allowing their safe application in future in vivo studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据