4.6 Article

Jamming transition in solutions containing organogelator molecules of amino-acid type: rheological and calorimetry experiments

期刊

SOFT MATTER
卷 9, 期 10, 页码 2947-2958

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c2sm26091c

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Research Agency [Blanc-SCD3 2008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The liquid to organogel transition of solutions containing new organogelator molecules of the amino-acid type is studied using rheological and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) techniques. This paper describes the formation of the organogel as a function of the temperature for various concentrations of the organogelator molecules, and the mechanical properties of the organogel as a function of concentration, frequency, thermal history and aging. We show that the organogel is not a physical gel, but a jammed suspension. The viscoelastic behavior at different extents of the jamming can be scaled onto a single master curve describing the growth of a solid network in a background fluid. The formation of the solid network exhibits a critical-like behavior that is reminiscent of elasticity percolation. Four characteristic temperatures have been identified: the temperature at which the clusters begin to form, the transition temperature between the liquid and the organogel, the onset temperature of the percolation-like behavior of the solid component of the system and the temperature at which the solid component has a pure elastic response. The comparison between the rheological measurements and the DSC measurements shows that the rheological measurements detect the fluid-to-organogel transition, whereas DSC detects the molecular associations in the material, which are at the origin of the formation of the clusters. The two temperatures differ significantly from each other and their difference gives the temperature range where the clusters are crowding. This study demonstrates for the first time that an organogel is not a physical gel, as it is currently believed, but a jammed suspension.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据