4.6 Article

Easily synthesized novel biodegradable copolyesters with adjustable properties for biomedical applications

期刊

SOFT MATTER
卷 8, 期 20, 页码 5466-5476

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c2sm25308a

关键词

-

资金

  1. Regione Emilia Romagna
  2. Regione Lombardia [SAL-45]
  3. FONDAZIONE ALMA MATER TICINENSIS
  4. International Centre for Studies and Research in Biomedicine (ICB) in Luxembourg

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Current compositions of biodegradable aliphatic polyesters experience a number of limitations associated with the difficulty of customizing mechanical, physicochemical, and biological properties for different biomedical applications. In this study, we propose a new class of multiblock copolyesters made using butylene succinate (BS) and triethylene succinate (TES). In particular, four copolyesters with the same chemical composition but different block lengths - P(BS18TES18), P(BS9TES9), P(BS4TES4), and P(BS2TES2) - were synthesized by reactive blending. Physicochemical characterization (DSC, WAXS, tensile tests, WCA, hydrolysis experiments) demonstrated that, by simply varying block length, it is possible to control polymer crystallinity, thermal and mechanical properties, wettability, and degradation rate. Copolymers displayed different stiffness, depending on the crystallinity degree, a tunable range of degradation rates, and different surface hydrophilicity. In vitro drug release and cell culture experiments were performed to evaluate the potential of these new copolyesters in the biomedical field. In particular, fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) was used as a model molecule to study the release profile of small molecules, and polymer cytocompatibility and fibronectin absorption capability were assessed. Depending on comonomer distribution, the polyesters are capable of releasing FITC in a tailorable manner. Moreover, the newly developed biomaterials are not cytotoxic and they are able to absorb proteins and, consequently, to tailor cell adhesion according to their surface hydrophilicity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据