4.6 Article

Drops on functional fibers: from barrels to clamshells and back

期刊

SOFT MATTER
卷 7, 期 11, 页码 5138-5143

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c0sm01403f

关键词

-

资金

  1. Chemical Sciences division of the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO-CW)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Drops on cylindrical fibers are a familiar sight, for instance in the form of dew drops on spider webs. They can exist in two competing morphologies, a cylindrically symmetric barrel state completely engulfing the fiber and an asymmetric clamshell state, in which the drop touches the fiber only sideways. Despite their omnipresence and their practical relevance, e. g. for the adherence of drops to fibers in separation technology and filter materials, the physical mechanisms governing the stability of the two morphologies remained elusive. Using electrowetting-functionalized fibers we can tune the wettability of the fibers and thereby reversibly switch between the two states. This allows determination of the stability limits of both morphologies as a function of the two relevant control parameters, namely the contact angle and the liquid volume. While clamshells are found to prevail for large contact angles and small volumes, and barrels prevail for small angles and large volumes, there is also a wide range of intermediate parameter values, for which both morphologies are mechanically stable. Mapping out the energy landscape of the system by numerical minimization of the free energy we find that the barrel state is easily deformed by non-axisymmetric perturbations. Such perturbations facilitate the transition to the clamshell state and thereby the removal of drops from the fibers. From a general perspective, the demonstration of electrowetting-based reversible switching of liquid morphologies on fibers opens up opportunities for designing functional textiles and porous materials for various applications in detergency, filtering, and controlled absorption and release of liquids.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据