4.6 Article

Self-assembly, condensation, and order in aqueous lyotropic chromonic liquid crystals crowded with additives

期刊

SOFT MATTER
卷 6, 期 17, 页码 4157-4167

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c0sm00065e

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF [DMR 0906751, 086991, 0710544, 0706290, 0606160]
  2. Ohio Board of Regents CMPND
  3. ORS
  4. W. M. Keck Foundation
  5. MURI AFOSR [FA9550-06-1-0337]
  6. US Department of Energy (DOE), Basic Energy Sciences (BES), Office of Science [W-31-109-Eng-38]
  7. US DOE, BES, Office of Science, through the Ames Laboratory [W-7405-Eng-82]
  8. DOE [DE-AC02-98CHI0886]
  9. NSERC
  10. CIHR
  11. NRC
  12. University of Saskatchewan
  13. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0906751] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dense multicomponent systems with macromolecules and small solutes attract a broad research interest as they mimic the molecularly crowded cellular interiors. The additives can condense and align the macromolecules, but they do not change the degree of covalent polymerization. We chose a lyotropic chromonic liquid crystal with reversibly and non-covalently assembled aggregates as a much softer system, reminiscent of living polymers, to demonstrate that small neutral and charged additives cause condensation of aggregates with ensuing orientational and positional ordering and nontrivial morphologies of phase separation, such as tactoids and toroids of the nematic and hexagonal columnar phase coexisting with the isotropic melt. Scanning transmission X-ray microscopy (STXM) with near edge X-ray absorption fine structure (NEXAFS) analysis as well as fluorescent microscopy demonstrates segregation of the components. The observations suggest that self-assembly of chromonic aggregates in the presence of additives is controlled by both entropy effects and by specific molecular interactions and provide a new route to the regulated reversible assembly of soft materials formed by low-molecular weight components.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据