4.6 Article

Hydrogel/electrospun fiber composites influence neural stem/progenitor cell fate

期刊

SOFT MATTER
卷 6, 期 10, 页码 2227-2237

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/b924349f

关键词

-

资金

  1. Advanced Food and Materials Network
  2. NSERC
  3. McEwen Center in Regenerative Medicine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cell replacement therapy with multi-potent neural stem/progenitor cells (NSPCs) into the injured spinal cord is limited by poor survival and host tissue integration. An injectable and biocompatible polymeric cell delivery system serves as a promising strategy to facilitate cell delivery, promote cell survival and direct cell behaviour. We developed and characterized the use of a physical hydrogel blend of hyaluronan (HA) and methylcellulose (MC) for NSPC delivery, and incorporated electrospun fibers of either collagen or poly(epsilon-caprolactone-co-D,L-lactide) (P(CL:DLLA)) to promote cell-matrix interactions and influence cell behaviour. The shear-thinning and thermally reversible HAMC had a zero-shear viscosity of 1.2 Pa s at 25 degrees C, formed a weak gel at 37 degrees C with a yield stress of 0.5 Pa, and swelled to 115% of its original volume after one day. HAMC was both cytocompatible and allowed NSPC differentiation in vitro, similar to what one would observe in media. Interestingly, cells cultured in HAMC remained homogeneously dispersed over the 7 d culture period, unlike those cultured in media controls where significant cell aggregation was observed. Inclusion of electrospun fibers in the HAMC hydrogel further influenced cell behaviour. Composite systems of collagen fibers in HAMC resulted in reduced survival/proliferation and differentiation relative to HAMC itself whereas composites of P(CL:DLLA) fibers in HAMC maintained cell survival/proliferation and enhanced neuronal and oligodendrocytic differentiation similar to HAMC. In this study, the importance of the cell delivery vehicle to NSPC survival and cell fate was demonstrated in vitro and is being tested in ongoing studies in vivo.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据