4.6 Article

Micropatterning of bioactive self-assembling gels

期刊

SOFT MATTER
卷 5, 期 6, 页码 1228-1236

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/b819002j

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Dental & Craniofacial Research (NIH/NIDCR) [5R01DE015920-3]
  2. Baxter Healthcare International
  3. National Science Foundation [DMR-0520513]
  4. Technical University of Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
  5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DENTAL & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH [R01DE015920] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microscale topographical features have been known to affect cell behavior. An important target in this area is to integrate top down techniques with bottom up self-assembly to create three-dimensional (3D) patterned bioactive mimics of extracellular matrices. We report a novel approach toward this goal and demonstrate its use to study the behavior of human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs). By incorporating polymerizable acetylene groups in the hydrophobic segment of peptide amphiphiles (PAs), we were able to micro-pattern nanofiber gels of these bioactive materials. PAs containing the cell adhesive epitope arginine-glycine-aspartic acid-serine (RGDS) were allowed to self-assemble within microfabricated molds to create networks of either randomly oriented or aligned similar to 30 nm diameter nanofiber bundles that were shaped into topographical patterns containing holes, posts, or channels up to 8 mm in height and down to 5 mm in lateral dimensions. When topographical patterns contained nanofibers aligned through flow prior to gelation, the majority of hMSCs aligned in the direction of the nanofibers even in the presence of hole microtextures and more than a third of them maintained this alignment when encountering perpendicular channel microtextures. Interestingly, in topographical patterns with randomly oriented nanofibers, osteoblastic differentiation was enhanced on hole microtextures compared to all other surfaces.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据