4.6 Article

Micro-stratified architectures based on successive stacking of alginate gel layers and poly(L-lysine)-hyaluronic acid multilayer films aimed at tissue engineering

期刊

SOFT MATTER
卷 4, 期 7, 页码 1422-1429

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/b801428k

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A micro-stratified 3D scaffold was designed by successive stacking of alginate gel layers (AGLs) and poly(L-lysine)-hyaluronic acid (PLL- HA) multilayer films. AGLs are obtained by complexation of alginate by Ca2+ ions. Alginate solutions are first sprayed onto a solid substrate inclined such that the excess of solution be removed by natural drainage. A CaCl2 solution is then either sprayed onto the substrate or the alginate covered substrate is dipped into a CaCl2 solution. The spraying of the CaCl2 solution leads to micro-porous AGLs, whereas the dipping in a CaCl2 aqueous solution leads to a more homogeneous gel layer without porosity. The second process also allows the formation of AGLs with a controlled thickness. With the goal of stacking different AGLs and PLL- HA films, the influence of a PLL- HA precursor film on the formation of AGLs is firstly investigated. It is found that when an alginate solution is sprayed on a PLL- HA multilayer built in the presence of CaCl2, the multilayer plays the role of reservoir of Ca2+ ions and of PLL chains, which both diffuse out of the multilayer film and complex alginate chains. This leads to the formation of a pre-alginate gel''. When this film is further dipped in the CaCl2 solution, an additional AGL forms, which is, however, free of PLL chains. Finally after the build-up of a PLL-HA film on the top of AGL, we succeeded in designing micro-stratified 3D scaffolds constituted by alternating strata of AGLs and PLL-HA films. This micro-stratified gel provides a new scaffold design with a perfectly controlled build-up: AGL aims to be a 3D scaffold for cell culture, and the PLL-HA multilayers should act as reservoirs for biologically active molecules.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据