4.4 Article

Gender differences in association between psychological distress and detailed living arrangements among Japanese older adults, aged 65-74 years

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00127-013-0778-8

关键词

Population-based survey; Older adults; K6; Psychological distress; Living arrangement

资金

  1. Japan Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports and Science and Technology [20500604]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25249071] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Past studies have shown that living alone is detrimental to older adults' mental health. However, there has been little focus on how older adults' psychological distress differed by more detailed living arrangement, as well as by gender. The present study investigates various living arrangements in association with psychological distress among older men and women. Data from community-dwelling Japanese older adults were collected through a mail survey (n = 1,807, aged 65-74 years, 51.5 % men). Psychological distress level was measured using Kessler's six-item psychological distress scale. Living arrangements were categorized into four groups; living with spouse only, living with spouse and other family, living with other family without spouse or living alone. Multiple logistic regression analyses were used to examine the associations of living arrangements with psychological distress level. Older adults living alone were observed to have higher psychological distress. In addition, gender-stratified analyses showed that higher distress levels were observed among older men living with family, but without a spouse (OR: 2.85, 95 % CI: 1.51-5.39). In contrast, higher distress was observed among older women living with spouse and other family (OR: 1.53, 95 % CI: 1.03-2.28). Psychological distress in older Japanese adults was associated with living arrangements, but such associations differed by gender. The association of living with a spouse on older men's mental health was striking, while living with any family was found to be rather important for older women, aged 65-74 years.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据