4.2 Article

Associations between oxytocin-related genes and autistic-like traits

期刊

SOCIAL NEUROSCIENCE
卷 9, 期 4, 页码 378-386

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17470919.2014.897995

关键词

Autism; Oxytocin; ARNT2; SIM1; CD38

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council
  2. Swedish Research Council for Working Life and Social Research
  3. Swedish Brain Foundation
  4. Svenska Sallskapet for Medicinsk Forskning (SSMF)
  5. Fredrik and Ingrid Thurings stiftelse
  6. Ake Wibergs stiftelse
  7. Ahlen-stiftelsen
  8. Jeanssons-stiftelsen
  9. Magnus Bergvalls stiftelse
  10. Soderstrom-Konigska stiftelsen
  11. Marta Lundqvists stiftelse
  12. Novo Nordisk Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Oxytocin has repeatedly been shown to influence human behavior in social contexts; also, a relationship between oxytocin and the pathophysiology of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) has been suggested. In the present study, we investigated single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the oxytocin gene (OXT) and the genes for single-minded 1 (SIM1), aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator 2 (ARNT2) and cluster of differentiation 38 (CD38) in a population of 1771 children from the Child and Adolescent Twin Study in Sweden (CATSS). Statistical analyses were performed to investigate any association between SNPs and autistic-like traits (ALTs), measured through ASD scores in the Autism-Tics, ADHD and other Co-morbidities inventory. Firstly, we found a statistically significant association between the SIM1 SNP rs3734354 (Pro352Thr) and scores for language impairment (p = .0004), but due to low statistical power this should be interpreted cautiously. Furthermore, nominal associations were found between ASD scores and SNPs in OXT, ARNT2 and CD38. In summary, the present study lends support to the hypothesis that oxytocin and oxytocin neuron development may have an influence on the development of ALTs and suggests a new candidate gene in the search for the pathophysiology of ASD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据