4.5 Article

From neural signatures of emotional modulation to social cognition: individual differences in healthy volunteers and psychiatric participants

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/scan/nst067

关键词

N170; SEM; social cognition; ADHD; BD; schizophrenia

资金

  1. Comision Nacional de Investigacion Cientifica y Tecnologica (CONICYT) CONICYT/FONDECYT Regular [1090610, 1130920]
  2. Fondo para la Investigacion Cientifica y Tecnologica (FONCyT-PICT) [2012-0412]
  3. FONCyT-PICT [2012-1309]
  4. James McDonnell Foundation
  5. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas (CONICET)
  6. INECO Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is commonly assumed that early emotional signals provide relevant information for social cognition tasks. The goal of this study was to test the association between (a) cortical markers of face emotional processing and (b) social-cognitive measures, and also to build a model which can predict this association (a and b) in healthy volunteers as well as in different groups of psychiatric patients. Thus, we investigated the early cortical processing of emotional stimuli (N170, using a face and word valence task) and their relationship with the social-cognitive profiles (SCPs, indexed by measures of theory of mind, fluid intelligence, speed processing and executive functions). Group comparisons and individual differences were assessed among schizophrenia (SCZ) patients and their relatives, individuals with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), individuals with euthymic bipolar disorder (BD) and healthy participants (educational level, handedness, age and gender matched). Our results provide evidence of emotional N170 impairments in the affected groups (SCZ and relatives, ADHD and BD) as well as subtle group differences. Importantly, cortical processing of emotional stimuli predicted the SCP, as evidenced by a structural equation model analysis. This is the first study to report an association model of brain markers of emotional processing and SCP.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据