4.6 Article

An accurate dynamic model for polycrystalline shape memory alloy wire actuators and sensors

期刊

SMART MATERIALS AND STRUCTURES
卷 28, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1361-665X/aae3b8

关键词

shape memory alloys; modeling; actuator; hysteresis; polycrystalline; internal loops; SMA wire

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Thermal shape memory alloy (SMA) wires exhibit a mechanical hysteresis of which the shape depends on both temperature and loading rate. Commercially available actuator wires typically exhibit polycrystalline behavior, which also depends on training effects. Polycrystallinity may lead to complex hysteresis loops, differing substantially from standard box shapes often employed in modeling attempts. In addition, actuation often results in loading trajectories leading through the interior of the hysteresis, making accurate modeling and control of SMA systems a highly challenging task. In this paper, we present a novel dynamic model for polycrystalline SMA actuator wires based on a modified version of the Miiller-Achenbach-Seelecke model. The model permits to predict time evolution of stress and resistance of a one-dimensional SMA wire under arbitrary input strain and Joule heating profiles. The constitutive equations are developed by properly exploiting the concept of a representative single-crystal, resulting in an optimal trade-off between physical interpretation and computational efficiency. After developing constitutive model equations, experimental validation is performed by means of two case studies, given by a superelastic NiTi wire and a quasi-plastic NiTi wire, respectively. The experiments are intended to illustrate the model capabilities in predicting internal hysteresis loops, loading rate effects, as well as actuation and sensing behavior at the same time. A remarkable accuracy is observed in all of the investigated experimental scenarios, making the model particularly suitable for high-precision control and self-sensing applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据