4.5 Review

Tropical cyclones in climate models

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/wcc.373

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [AGS-1143959]
  2. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) [NA110AR4310093]
  3. NSF AGS Postdoctoral Research Fellowship [1433251]
  4. Div Atmospheric & Geospace Sciences
  5. Directorate For Geosciences [1433251] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this review, we provide a historical overview of the simulation of tropical cyclones (TCs) in climate models, from the first attempts in the 1970s to the current state-of-the-art models. We discuss the status of TC simulation across multiple time scales, from intraseasonal, seasonal, and decadal, to climate change. One of the limitations on the simulation of TCs in climate models has been, and continues to be, balancing the high resolution necessary to accurately simulate TCs themselves with the need to run simulations for many years and using many ensemble members. Several approaches to inferring TC activity indirectly, rather than relying on the models own under-resolved TCs, are reviewed, including the use of TC genesis indices based on the large-scale environment and downscaling methods such as the use of regional climate models and statistical-dynamical techniques. We also provide an update on the status of climate change projections from the current class of models, where it is feasible to directly track the model's TCs. While there has been great progress in the capability of climate models to simulate TCs and provide useful forecasts and projections across multiple time scales, there remains much work to be done. We list some of the sources of uncertainty and model sensitivity, describe where improvements are necessary, and provide a few suggestions for promising research directions. WIREs Clim Change 2016, 7:211-237. doi: 10.1002/wcc.373 For further resources related to this article, please visit the .

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据