4.3 Article

Isolation, antibiotic resistance, virulence traits and phylogenetic analysis of Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis from goats in southwestern China

期刊

SMALL RUMINANT RESEARCH
卷 168, 期 -, 页码 69-75

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2018.09.015

关键词

Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis; Goats; Antimicrobial resistance; Virulence genes; Phylogenetic analysis

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [XDJK2018C054]
  2. Social Undertakings and Livelihood Security Technology Innovation Projects of Chongqing [CSTC2018JSCX-MSYBX0216]
  3. Plan of Entrepreneurial and Innovative Support for Overseas Students in Chongqing [CX2017103]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis, a gram-positive facultative intracellular bacteria, usually resulted in covert but huge economic losses in goats and sheep industry. Limited information is available rewardingly in southwestern China, one of the most important regions for goats production. This study reported for the first time the isolation and molecular characteristics of C. pseudotuberculosis from external abscess of goats in southwestern China, and found that (1) the isolation rate of C. pseudotuberculosis in abscess of goats was 39.22% (40/102), (2) all of isolated strains were sensitive to vancomycin, norfioxacin, cefradine, clarithromycin and cefepime, but resistant to nitrofurantoin and furazolidone, (3) the virulence or putative virulence genes including PLD, FagA, FagB, FagC, FagD, SigE, SpaC, SodC, PknG, NanH, OppA, OppB, OppC, OppD, OppF, CopC, NrdH and CpaE were presented in all C. pseudotuberculosis strains, (4) the housekeeping gene fusA can effectively differentiate biovar ovis from biovar equi in phylogenic analysis and can be employed for further epidemiological study of C. pseudotuberculosis. Briefly, this study provided the basic information for infection of C. pseudotuberculosis in goats and will help in controlling of this pathogen in southwestern China.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据