4.3 Article Proceedings Paper

Evaluation of goat mortadella prepared with different levels of fat and goat meat from discarded animals

期刊

SMALL RUMINANT RESEARCH
卷 98, 期 1-3, 页码 59-63

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2011.03.019

关键词

Mortadella; Goat meat; Discarded animals; Fat

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The objectives of this study were to develop a value added product, goat mortadella. using meat from discarded animals; to evaluate pork fat at various levels of inclusion in mortadella in an effort to reduce the fat content of the product; to determine consumer acceptability; and to determine the physico-chemical properties of this goat product. Three goat mortadella formulations were manufactured containing 10, 20 and 30% pork fat. The sensory characteristics, microbiological and proximate analysis, starch, chlorides, pH, water activity (Aw), water holding capacity (WHC), emulsion stability and CIE colour characteristics (i.e. a*, b* and L*) of the mortadella were evaluated. The total number of thermotolerant conforms. Staphylococcus aureus, Salmonella and Clostridium sulphite-reducers in the goat mortadella were in accordance with Brazilian legislation. Consumer panellists detected significant differences (P < 0.05) in appearance, colour, odour, flavour, texture and overall acceptance among the goat mortadella formulations. The goat mortadella prepared with 10% fat was rated the highest. In addition, approximately 70% of the panellists commented that they would purchase the goat mortadella. The percentages of moisture and protein were reduced as the percentages of fat added to the formulation increased. The goat mortadella with 30% fat had higher (P < 0.05) fat, ash, emulsion stability. WHC and b* contents than those with 10 and 20% fat. The use of meat from discarded goats in the preparation of mortadella allows getting the most from this material, and the addition of 10% fat resulted in a goat mortadella with better acceptance and lowest fat content. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据