4.8 Article

Lighting Up MicroRNA in Living Cells by the Disassembly of Lock-Like DNA-Programmed UCNPs-AuNPs through the Target Cycling Amplification Strategy

期刊

SMALL
卷 14, 期 40, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/smll.201802292

关键词

gold nanoparticles; microRNA; signal amplification; upconversion nanoparticles

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21335004, 21673108, 21605088]
  2. International Cooperation Foundation from Ministry of Science and Technology [2016YFE0130100]
  3. Natural Science Research Key Project of Education Department of Anhui Province [KJ2017A434]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Intracellular microRNAs imaging based on upconversion nanoprobes has great potential in cancer diagnostics and treatments. However, the relatively low detection sensitivity limits their application. Herein, a lock-like DNA (LLD) generated by a hairpin DNA (H1) hybridizing with a bolt DNA (bDNA) sequence is designed, which is used to program upconversion nanoparticles (UCNPs, NaYF4@NaYF4:Yb, Er@NaYF4) and gold nanoparticles (AuNPs). The upconversion emission is quenched through luminescence resonance energy transfer (LRET). The multiple LLD can be repeatedly opened by one copy of target microRNA under the aid of fuel hairpin DNA strands (H2) to trigger disassembly of AuNPs from the UCNP, resulting in the lighting up of UCNPs with a high detection signal gain. This strategy is verified using microRNA-21 as model. The expression level of microRNA-21 in various cells lines can be sensitively measured in vitro, meanwhile cancer cells and normal cells can be easily and accurately distinguished by intracellular microRNA-21 imaging via the nanoprobes. The detection limit is about 1000 times lower than that of the previously reported upconversion nanoprobes without signal amplification. This is the first time a nonenzymatic signal amplification method has been combined with UCNPs for imaging intracellular microRNAs, which has great potential for cancer diagnosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据