4.8 Article

Highly Dispersed Copper Nanoparticles Supported on Activated Carbon as an Efficient Catalyst for Selective Reduction of Vanillin

期刊

SMALL
卷 14, 期 36, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/smll.201801953

关键词

carbothermal; copper; hydrodeoxygenation; transfer-hydrogenation; vanillin

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51432009, 51502297, 51372248]
  2. Instrument Developing Project of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [yz201421]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Highly dispersed copper nanoparticles (Cu NPs) supported on activated carbon (AC) are effectively synthesized by one-pot carbothermal method at temperature range of 400-700 degrees C. The X-ray diffraction, transmission electron microscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and Brunauer-Emmett-Teller analysis reveal that Cu NPs with diameters of 20-30 nm are evenly anchored in carbon matrix. The 15 wt%-Cu/AC-600 catalyst (derived at 600 degrees C) exhibits best bifunctional catalysis of aqueous-phase hydrodeoxygenation (HDO) and organic-phase transfer-hydrogenation reaction (THR) to selectively transform vanillin to 2-methoxy-4-methylphenol (MMP). In HDO of vanillin, the as-prepared catalyst achieves a 99.9% vanillin conversion and 93.2% MMP selectivity under 120 degrees C, 2.0 MPa H-2 within 5 h. Meanwhile, near-quantitative vanillin conversion and 99.1% MMP selectivity are also obtained under 180 degrees C within 5 h in THR of vanillin by using 2-propanol as hydrogen donor. The transforming pathways of vanillin are also proposed: vanillin is transformed into MMP via intermediate of 4-hydroxymethyl-2-methoxyphenol in HDO case and by direct hydrogenolysis of vanillin in THR course. More importantly, the activity and the selectivity do not change after 5 cycles, indicating the catalyst has excellent stability. The Cu-based catalyst is relatively cheap and preparation method is facile, green, and easy scale-up, thus achieving a low-cost transformation of biomass to bio-oils and chemicals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据