4.8 Article

Physical Deposition Improved SERS Stability of Morphology Controlled Periodic Micro/Nanostructured Arrays Based on Colloidal Templates

期刊

SMALL
卷 11, 期 7, 页码 844-853

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/smll.201402630

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2012CB932303]
  2. Recruitment Program of Global Experts (C)
  3. Natural Science Foundation of China [11104269, 10974203, 51371165]
  4. Anhui Provincial Natural Science Funds for Distinguished Young Scholar [1108085J20]
  5. Cross-disciplinary Collaborative Teams Program of CAS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An effective and inexpensive method is developed to fabricate periodic arrays by sacrificial colloidal monolayer template route by chemical deposition and further physical deposition. By a colloidal template induced precursor solution dipping strategy, different periodic arrays of semi-hollow sphere array, inverse opal with monolayer pore arrays and hole arrays are obtained under different conditions. After magnetron sputtering deposition, their morphologies are changed to novel micro/nanostructured arrays of honeycomb-shaped arrays, hollow cavity arrays, and regular network arrays due to multiple direction deposition of sputtering deposition and shadow effect. After coating a gold thin layer, these periodic micro/nanostructured arrays are used as SERS active substrates and demonstrate a very stable SERS performance compared with periodic arrays achieved by direct colloidal template-induced chemical deposition. Additionally, a honeycomb-shaped array displays better SERS enhancement than that of a hollow cavity array or a regular network array. After optimization of honeycomb-shaped arrays with different periodicities, an array with periodicity of 350 nm demonstrates much stronger SERS enhancement and possesses a low detection limit of 10(-11) M R6G. Such stable SERS performance is useful for practical application in portable Raman detecting devices to detect organic molecules.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据