4.8 Article

Plasmonic ZnO/Ag Embedded Structures as Collecting Layers for Photogenerating Electrons in Solar Hydrogen Generation Photoelectrodes

期刊

SMALL
卷 9, 期 17, 页码 2926-2936

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/smll.201202547

关键词

hydrogen generation; ZnO; Ag; plasmonics; femtosecond-laser direct-write; silver oxide

资金

  1. National Science Council of Taiwan [NSC 101-2113-M-002-014-MY3, 100-2923-M-002-007-MY3, 101-2112-M-002-023-, 101-2911-I-002-107, NSC 101-3113-P-002-021]
  2. National Center for Theoretical Sciences, Taipei Office, Molecular Imaging Center of National Taiwan University
  3. National Center for High-Performance Computing, Taiwan
  4. Research Center for Applied Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taiwan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new fabrication strategy in which Ag plasmonics are embedded in the interface between ZnO nanorods and a conducting substrate is experimentally demonstrated using a femtosecond-laser (fs-laser)-induced plasmonic ZnO/Ag photoelectrodes. This fs-laser fabrication technique can be applied to generate patternable plasmonic nanostructures for improving their effectiveness in hydrogen generation. Plasmonic ZnO/Ag nanostructure photoelectrodes show an increase in the photocurrent of a ZnO nanorod photoelectrodes by higher than 85% at 0.5 V. Both localized surface plasmon resonance in metal nanoparticles and plasmon polaritons propagating at the metal/semiconductor interface are available for improving the capture of sunlight and collecting charge carriers. Furthermore, in-situ X-ray absorption spectroscopy is performed to monitor the plasmonic-generating electromagnetic field upon the interface between ZnO/Ag nanostructures. This can reveal induced vacancies on the conduction band of ZnO, which allow effective separation of charge carriers and improves the efficiency of hydrogen generation. Plasmon-induced effects enhance the photoresponse simultaneously, by improving optical absorbance and facilitating the separation of charge carriers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据