4.8 Article

Synthesis of Manganese Ferrite/Graphene Oxide Nanocomposites for Biomedical Applications

期刊

SMALL
卷 8, 期 23, 页码 3620-3630

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/smll.201201427

关键词

magnetic nanoparticles; graphene oxide; nanocomposites; magnetic hyperthermia; magnetic resonance imaging

资金

  1. Singapore MOE's ARF Tier 1 [WBS R-284-000-088-112]
  2. Department of Materials Science and Engineering, National University of Singapore

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, MnFe2O4 nanoparticle (MFNP)-decorated graphene oxide nanocomposites (MGONCs) are prepared through a simple mini-emulsion and solvent evaporation process. It is demonstrated that the loading of magnetic nanocrystals can be tuned by varying the ratio of graphene oxide/magnetic nanoparticles. On top of that, the hydrodynamic size range of the obtained nanocomposites can be optimized by varying the sonication time during the emulsion process. By fine-tuning the sonication time, MGONCs as small as 56.8 +/- 1.1 nm, 55.0 +/- 0.6 nm and 56.2 +/- 0.4 nm loaded with 6 nm, 11 nm, and 14 nm MFNPs, respectively, are successfully fabricated. In order to improve the colloidal stability of MGONCs in physiological solutions (e.g., phosphate buffered saline or PBS solution), MGONCs are further conjugated with polyethylene glycol (PEG). Heating by exposing MGONCs samples to an alternating magnetic field (AMF) show that the obtained nanocomposites are efficient hyperthermia agents. At concentrations as low as 0.1 mg Fe mL-1 and under an 59.99 kA m-1 field, the highest specific absorption rate (SAR) recorded is 1588.83 W g-1 for MGONCs loaded with 14 nm MFNPs. It is also demonstrated that MGONCs are promising as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) T2 contrast agents. A T2 relaxivity value (r2) as high as 256.2 (mM Fe)-1 s-1 could be achieved with MGONCs loaded with 14 nm MFNPs. The cytotoxicity results show that PEGylated MGONCs exhibit an excellent biocompatibility that is suitable for biomedical applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据