4.6 Review

Low-grade inflammation in the relationship between sleep disruption, dysfunctional adiposity, and cognitive decline in aging

期刊

SLEEP MEDICINE REVIEWS
卷 42, 期 -, 页码 171-183

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.smrv.2018.08.002

关键词

Aging; Cognitive decline; Sleep; Adiposity; Inflammaging; Alzheimer's disease

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [PSI2017-85311-P, SAF2017-85310-R]
  2. Regional Ministry of Innovation, Science and Enterprise, Junta de Andalucia [P12-CTS-2327]
  3. International Center on Aging CENIE-POCTEP [0348_CIE_6_E]
  4. CIBERNED [CB06/05/1111]
  5. Spanish Sleep Society
  6. Fulbright U.S. Student Program and the Spain Fulbright Commission

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aging is characterized by a progressive increase in proinflammatory status. This state, known as inflammaging, has been associated with cognitive decline in normal and pathological aging. However, this relationship has been inconsistently reported, likely because it is conditioned by other factors also affected by the aging process. Sleep and adiposity are two factors in particular that show significant alterations with aging and have been related to both cognitive decline and inflammaging. Given the consequences this state also has for brain integrity and cognition, we discuss here evidence supporting the potential mediating role of chronic low-grade systemic inflammation in the complex relationship between impaired sleep, dysfunctional adiposity, and cognitive decline through the common pathway of neuroinflammation. This review proposes a multi-factor model of aging-related cognitive decline that highlights the reciprocal interactions between sleep, the circadian system, and inflammation on the one hand, and between sleep, adiposity, and hormone resistance on the other. The model identifies sleep and adiposity as modifiable lifestyle factors that can be targeted to maximize cognitive function and quality of life in the elderly. (c) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据