4.4 Article

Efficacy of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for resected thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

期刊

THORACIC CANCER
卷 6, 期 5, 页码 597-604

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.12228

关键词

Esophageal neoplasms; surgery; intensity-modulated radiotherapy; postoperative; prognosis

资金

  1. Chinese National Natural Sciences Foundation [81021061, 39925020]
  2. Science and Technology Project of Beijing [Z121107001012004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundLittle is known about the clinical use of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) of esophageal cancer; therefore, we retrospectively investigated the clinical value of postoperative IMRT among resected thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (TESCC) patients. MethodsWe enrolled a total of 228 patients with resected TESCC who underwent IMRT between January 2004 and June 2009 in the study. PORT was applied via IMRT with a median total dose of 60Gy. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate survival rates, and a log-rank test was used for univariate analysis. The Cox proportional model was used for multivariate analysis. ResultsThe one, three, and five-year overall survival rates of all patients were 89.9%, 56.7%, and 45.1%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that significant prognostic factors included Union for International Cancer Control 2002 stage, lymphatic metastasis, number of metastatic lymph nodes, the degree of metastatic lymph nodes, the degree of differentiation, and vascular tumor thrombus (P < 0.05). Treatment failure occurred in 98 (45.2%) patients because of recurrence or metastases. Early reactions were observed at rates of 18.0% for radiation esophagitis and 5.7% for radiation pneumonitis more than grade 2. Late side effects included anastomotic stenosis (1.3%) and gastrointestinal bleeding (3.1%). ConclusionsThe postoperative prophylactic IMRT of TESCC provided a favorable local control rate and acceptable toxicity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据