4.6 Article

Sleep apnea increased incidence of primary central nervous system cancers: a nationwide cohort study

期刊

SLEEP MEDICINE
卷 15, 期 7, 页码 749-754

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.sleep.2013.11.782

关键词

Sleep apnea; Central nervous system; Cancers; Insomnia; Hypersomnia; Surgery

资金

  1. Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Chiayi, Taiwan [DTCRD100-2-I-03]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) was associated with increased incidence of all cancers. We aimed to determine the risk for primary central nervous system (CNS) cancers in patients with sleep apnea syndrome. Methods: A total of 23,055 incident cases of newly diagnosed sleep apnea syndrome (sleep apnea group) were identified between 2000 and 2003 in the medical claims database of Taiwan's National Health Institute (NHI) program and were matched by age and gender to patients without OSA (comparison group) in the same period. The occurrence of primary malignant CNS cancers was measured 2 years after the index date over a 10-year period. Results: The incidence density of primary CNS cancers (per 10,000 individual-years) was 2.14 and 1.28, respectively, for the OSA and comparison groups. The overall risk for developing primary CNS cancers was significantly higher in the OSA group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.54; P = 0.046) after adjusting for age, gender, and obesity, among other variables. Subgroup analysis revealed a significantly higher risk for primary brain cancers but not primary spinal cord cancers in the OSA subgroup (adjusted HR, 1.71; P = 0.027). The analysis also revealed a significantly higher risk for primary CNS cancers in the insomnia with OSA subgroup (adjusted HR, 2.20; P = 0.001) and in the OSA without surgical treatment subgroup (adjusted HR, 1.831; P = 0.003). Conclusions: OSA, especially with insomnia, may increase the risk for primary CNS cancer development, though surgical treatment may reduce this risk in participants with OSA. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据