4.6 Article

Predictors of shorter sleep in early childhood

期刊

SLEEP MEDICINE
卷 15, 期 5, 页码 536-540

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.sleep.2014.01.005

关键词

Sleep; Child; Predictors; Behaviour; Bedtime; Wake time

资金

  1. Cancer Research UK [C1418/A7974]
  2. UK Medical Research Council PhD studentship
  3. Cancer Research UK [14133] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. Medical Research Council [1178015] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: The aim of this study was to identify socio-demographic and home environmental predictors of shorter sleep in early childhood, and to examine whether effects were mediated by the timing of bedtime or wake time. Methods: Participants were from Gemini, a British birth cohort of twins, and included 1702 children; one randomly selected from each twin pair. Parents reported night-time sleep duration at an average age of 15.8 months (range 14-27 months) using a modified version of the Brief Infant Sleep Questionnaire. Multiple logistic regression models were used to identify predictors of shorter sleep for this study. Results: Using a cut-off of < 11 h a night, shorter sleep was reported in 14.1% of children. Lower maternal education, non-white ethnic background, being male, low birth weight, living in a home with > 1 older child and watching >1 h of TV in the evening were independently associated with shorter sleep. Mediation analyses showed that associations between education, ethnicity, evening TV viewing and sleep were driven predominantly by later bedtimes, while sex differences were driven predominantly by earlier wake times in boys. Conclusion: In this sample, multiple environmental factors were associated with shorter sleep in young children, with several operating predominantly through later bedtime. An emphasis on the importance of an early and consistent bedtime could help promote healthy sleep and reduce inequalities in child health. (C) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据