4.6 Article

Iron deficiency anemia in infancy exerts long-term effects on the tibialis anterior motor activity during sleep in childhood

期刊

SLEEP MEDICINE
卷 13, 期 8, 页码 1006-1012

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.sleep.2012.05.011

关键词

Iron deficiency anemia in infancy; Periodic leg movements during sleep; Periodicity index; Non-REM sleep; Long-term effects of iron deficiency anemia in infancy; Children

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA [R01 HD33487]
  2. Chilean Agency for Funding in Science and Technology (CONICYT) [Fondecyt 1070668]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: To explore the eventual connection between iron deficiency anemia (IDA) in infancy and altered leg movements during sleep in. a 10-year follow-up study in children who did or did not have IDA in infancy. Subjects and methods: Polysomnographic studies were performed in 32 10-year-old children (13 females and 19 males) who had IDA in infancy and 26 peers (10 females and 16 males) who were nonanemic controls. The time structure of their polysomnographically recorded leg movements (LM) was analyzed by means of an approach particularly able to consider their quantity, periodicity, and distribution during the night. Results: All LM indexes and those related to periodic LM during sleep (PLMS) were slightly higher in the former IDA group than in the control group, but not always significant. The Periodicity index during NREM sleep was higher and was reflected by a small but significant increase in PLMS separated by 10-50 s intervals. PLMS index tended to be higher in former IDA children than in controls throughout the whole night. Conclusion: The association between IDA in infancy, despite iron therapy, and PLMS in childhood could lead to new research in this area. Indeed, transient infantile IDA, a common nutritional problem among human infants, may turn out to be important for understanding the mechanisms of PLMS or restless legs syndrome, which are common in adulthood. (C) 2012 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据