4.6 Article

Increased Sleep Promotes Survival during a Bacterial Infection in Drosophila

期刊

SLEEP
卷 37, 期 6, 页码 1077-U180

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.5665/sleep.3764

关键词

ion channels; NF kappa B; innate immunity; bacterial infection; Drosophila

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [IOS-1025627]
  2. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems
  3. Direct For Biological Sciences [1025627] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Study Objectives: The relationship between sleep and immune function is not well understood at a functional or molecular level. We therefore used a genetic approach in Drosophila to manipulate sleep and evaluated effects on the ability of flies to fight bacterial infection. Setting: Laboratory. Participants: Drosophila melanogaster. Methods and Results: We used a genetic approach to transiently alter neuronal excitability in the mushroom body, a region in the central brain that is known to regulate sleep. Flies with increased sleep for up to two days prior to a bacterial infection showed increased resistance to the infection and improved survival. These flies also had increased expression levels of a subset of anti-microbial peptide mRNA prior to infection, as well as increased NF kappa B activity during infection as indicated by in vivo luciferase reporter activity. In contrast, flies that experienced reduced sleep for up to two days prior to infection had no effect on survival or on NF kappa B activity during infection. However, flies with reduced sleep showed an altered defense mechanism, such that resistance to infection was increased, but at the expense of reduced tolerance. This effect was dependent on environmental condition. Conclusions: Increasing sleep enhanced activity of an NF kappa B transcription factor, increased resistance to infection, and strongly promoted survival. Together, these findings support the hypothesis that sleep is beneficial to the host by maintaining a robust immune system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据